thread: New Martingale EA (logic like Mathtrader EA)

quote how many pairs \what pairs do you use and what span if I may ask? Thank you for the help in advance

only 1 pair GU m1.

But in the present time the new variant is given V3.3 and there seems like different benefits in Backtest I fix both version with same parameters...I try to get assistance from edge0xc concerning my issue...

quote hey, yes I changed the dynamic grid calculation and forced it (in my eyes) a little more initiutive. If you would like, I can send you a variant, where I used the old routine. The new routine calculates the grid as follows: select the Timeframe and the period. Then multiply it with the ADR factor. Regards

thank you, the tiny shift of the grid parameter did stop me to test the EA on live... It seems very good to understand the reason today. Please can you provide the old routine variant V3.1, therefore that I can continue the live test. . I can't replicate the sets to the new edition. I value much for your help.

quote thank you, the little change of the grid parameter did stop me to test the EA on live... It sounds very good to understand the reason today. Please can you give the old routine variant V3.1, so I will continue the live test. . I just can not replicate the same sets to the new version. I appreciate much for your help.

Hey,

here the EA with the preceding logic.

Please let me know, if your backtests are consistent today.
https://www.cliqforex.com/attachment...301845742778.2

quote Hey, here the EA Together with All the previous logic. Please allow me to know, if your backtests are consistent today. document

thank you. . It's not V3.1 but seems like in BT it is with the exact same logic...I will now begin testing....the V3.1 and v3.2 differs with the ADR filter, however the BT is all but same..ok currently lets begin...)

At the present time the version 3.1 Woking well.

Nice! 3.3 or 3.2 (that I simply uploaded) are almost the same.

cheers

Nice! 3.3 or 3.2 (that I just uploaded) are nearly the same. Cheers

Now I have loaded V3.2 according your previous post. . Today was very good with v3.1 settings. Same set didn't worked fine in V3.3.

Can I ask you. Is V3.2 Exactly like V3.1. . Because V3.1 worked very great .

I loaded same set to V3.2 and today was great and wish to remain in same manner as V3.1 did a month.
Thank you

108183 it's 3.1
https://www.cliqforex.com/attachment...061361262242.1

108183

quote Now I have loaded V3.2 according your previous article. . Today was very good with v3.1 settings. Same set did not worked fine in V3.3. Can I ask you. Is V3.2 the same as V3.1. . Since V3.1 worked very great . I loaded same group to V3.2 and now was great and wish to remain exactly the same way as V3.1 did last month. Thank you

the only change was the calculation of ADR and I added dynamic lot. The version I uploaded in one of my posts has the old way of calculating ADR. Should you put dynamic lotfalse, you need to have exactly the same behaviour as 3.1

918661 Structure (s)

quote the only change was that the calculation of ADR and I added lively lot. The variant I uploaded in one of my articles has the old way of calculating ADR. If you set lively lot=false, you should have exactly the same behavior as 3.1

thanks. . .the energetic lot is untrue in V3.2....the Adr is inserted into Dynamic Grid, I watched....for now it is behaving like V3.1 and it is working great. Lets see how I'll shut the week tomorrow... The setfile is as in my previous articles in this thread. .

A bit corrupt because of Version changes, but its okay now, good job