thread: New Martingale EA (logic like Mathtrader EA)

91866

quote FBS live and demo? Which kind of account? image

Dear Lesse,

sorry on answer late. . .Let me explain so..Whenever I examine real account an EA, I examine it on Cent account. Doing this my risk desire is very very low, and after I choose to proceed on Micro account. FBS Cent account stinks are also rather good. Beside of the results that I have shown here were from another broker, a broker, but are very like my real account, thats. . .After it demonstrated me consistent results I can proceed to my Micro account. . .Before this I would like to see a proven 2- month consistent winning attack with non DD
For today it is going very very smooth

91866

quote Hi freedom Nice outcomes. I've a question: which sessions are you trading? What are your preferences at Stop hour GMT and Starthour GMT? Cheers!

There is absolutely not any start hour no stop hour for the time being. . I did commerce and took all of the risks of reddish news. I'd like to observe that the day, but until now it is going well, despite all of the risk. .

91866 Dear edge0xc,


can it be easy please to re-load the version 3.1 parameters as it was on the new version or on another new version without any change... I'm unable to convert the parameters into the new version just as as it was...I can not get the same effect with v3.3 as it was on v3.1 I change all possible parameters as same.
That would be greatful, otherwise I will be unable to finish my test course on account. I want to show both results is BT with completely same parameters loaded

You upload your own set? I will have a look. There is nonchange in logic. Only the grid calculation has shifted. And upload the version you're comparing.
Regards

Dear, can it be easy please to re-load the version 3.1 parameters because it was on the new version or on another new version with no change... I'm unable to convert the parameters into the new version as same as it had been...I can not obtain exactly the exact same result with v3.3 because it had been on v3.1 even I alter all possible parameters as same. That might be greatful I will not be able to complete my evaluation course on account. I Would like to show both results is BT with completely same parameters loadedimageimage

91866 this is another backtest with EurChf running regular the previous 2 decades. (according to tick information )

91866

Can you upload your set? I will have a look. There is nonchange in logic. Just the lively grid calculation has changed. And upload the model you are currently comparing. Regards quote

Here is the V3.1 set I've used and V3.3 put in compare. . .both are providing outcomes. . I correct the grid calculation that is energetic, however it did not? https://www.cliqforex.com/attachment...733990478124.1https://www.cliqforex.com/attachment...411176977541.3

this is just another backtest with EurChf running regular the previous 2 decades. (based on tick data) image

thank you edge0xc,
only ran a quick BT on EURUSD 5min with preceding settings and looks very promising, will forwards test it on actual servers and post results. Cheers
with this eurchf, any other pairs works well in your side?

quote Dear Lesse, sorry on answer late. . .Let me clarify so..Whenever I test on real account an EA, I test it on Cent account. Doing so my risk appetite is really very low, and after I decide to proceed Micro account. FBS Cent account spreads are also very good. Beside of the the results that I have revealed here were from a different broker, a neighborhood broker, but are very similar to my Cent real account, thats why I did not show double. . .After it proven me consistent results I can proceed to my Micro account. . .Before this I want to see a recognized...

the number of pairs \what pairs do you use and what timeframe if I can ask? Thank you for the help

quote Here is your V3.1 set I have used and V3.3 put in compare. . .both are providing results. . I also adjust the dynamic grid , but it did not 1_EXTENSIONthing I have missed? filefile

hey,

yes I altered the dynamic grid calculation and made it (in my eyes) a little more initiutive. If you want, I can send you a version, where I used the old pattern.

The new pattern computes the grid as follows:

choose the Timeframe and also the interval. Then multiply it using the ADR element.

Regards

quote hello, yes I altered the dynamic grid calculation and forced it (in my eyes) a bit more initiutive. If you want, I can send you a version, where I used the old pattern. The new pattern computes the grid as follows: select the Timeframe and also the period. Multiply it. Regards

Hello!

Can it be possible to split the version with the old pattern with everyone so we are able to examine the differences between the 2 versions?