Newbies Mistakes -
1 2 3 4 5 ...

thread: Newbies Mistakes

  1. #21
    Junior Member alexandrasanz's Avatar
    23
    quote Unfortunately no. It is. Employees and intital investors only I'm afraid
    welp. . haha

  2. #22
    Junior Member samufd's Avatar
    23
    quote Hello Mr , can I join your group too?
    Unfortunately no. It is a private trading group that's connect to your own business. Employees and intital investors only I'm afraid

  3. #23
    Junior Member alexandrasanz's Avatar
    23
    I'm also successful. I have an internet lead generation business. I am a part of a professional group trading account that employs a system that is holygrailesque. I've embraced this system to exchange my account. I utilized the month of January to check and make sure the system how my group does and I have could was executed by me this month. I will begin using my personal money come mid Feb.. I am governmental. I really do some fund raising.
    Hi Mr sharingan9, can I join your group too?

  4. #24
    Junior Member samufd's Avatar
    23
    I am profitable. I have an internet lead generation enterprise. I am a part of a professional team trading account which employs a system. I've adopted this system to exchange my account. I used the month of January make sure I executed and to check this month, and I've done. I will begin using my personal cash come mid Feb..

    I also am political. I do some fund raising.

  5. #25
    Junior Member javier03bcn's Avatar
    28
    I'm successful, but not out of trading. But the definition is covered by me, cause being powerful and a hobby trader in the same time, addresses the significance of trader. I hope you understand that. My trading does not have to be prosperous, because in the front of the term trader, I have the term powerful, which I'm and after all does not actually count or matter.

    Last, but not least, I have one of the best low IQs on this forum. That is just another thing I can beat you at! Nobody can beat my IQ of 75 points! So, calling me Champ, wouldn't be an inappropriate... Got this?

  6. #26
    Junior Member Pelirrojaaa13's Avatar
    17
    quote Yes. This is your evidence. Now, let's have some fun. I'll bet gravitist 10k he will not be able to control himself from posting some sort of reply, directly or otherwise. Same bet applies to the usual suspects. LOL And I'll wager an amount which their replies have no effect on the functioning of the account. Which sort of makes any trade pointless, as money speaks it will in my book. Get out your popcorn, people....
    Sucessfull I would specify in my opinion, as soon as you can earn more then 2 times (greater 5-10 times to compensate holidays and infrstructure and individuals payed possibly) the cash each month (generally over one year) you could get with a fantastic job ( or all your additional opportunity costs for doing so trading, even if you've still the work then the costs are very small and sucess is much more easy to get), so you are compensated for investing some time and work and more risk. And of course the account includes a upward equity curve, quite little standard deviation and smaller max drawdown.
    But sucess only to see in 1 account is often near impossible (possibly when somebody has of his asset and cash in this account), near anyone with sucess spend the shortterm profits in mid and longterm investments and the entire package performance has to be rated as sucess or no sucess. So from 1 account it is hard to say anything about sucess of a trader, only from all resources somebody has.

  7. #27
    That is why I consider threads such as this to be moot.
    It's almost reached the stage where that statement could read true for the entire forum.
    We have armchair analysts cutting and pasting their stats from Wikipedia all the while citing academic studies
    from recognized sources that are faulty. The newest recent thread is all about suicide, and also the interactive
    area is full of posters drawing a line below and above current price then telling you they know where
    the market is led lol.

    And do not get me started on the commercial associates thatcliqforexshould have put put behind a paywall that a LONG
    time past.

    This place has become the trading equal of a Philip K Dick novel - fascinating reading but likely to piss you off.

  8. #28
    Junior Member
    22
    Well actually if you should read most of the articles posted in this forum about the market, 90 percent of the traders here are powerful and you will have a real difficulty to discover a ineffective one. Hehe. GS
    You have clarifiedcliqforexperfectly



    Thanks.

  9. #29
    quote ... I'll bet gravitist 10k that he won't have the ability to control himself from posting some kind of response, right or otherwise. Wager that is same applies to the other usual suspects. LOL ....
    Well, as hopefully considered one of the usual suspects, I only respond to make clear that 10k won't be sufficient to silence me.... LOL.
    It is not even a matter of money! Enough people sell their spirit in this industry.

    This glow announcement, in its current form, is no valid evidence for a prosperous retail trader and you understand precisely why.

  10. #30
    quote Yes. Here is your evidence. Now, let us have some fun. I will wager gravitist 10k that he will not be able to control himself from posting some sort of reply, right or otherwise. Wager applies to the other usual suspects. LOL And I will bet an amount that is even larger that their answers don't have any effect on the future performance of the account. Which sort of makes any exchange useless, as money speaks louder than words, or at least it does in my book. Get out your popcorn, folks....
    The that-was-then and this-is-now evidence will always be considerably more powerful than just the this-is-now evidence.

  •