THE TURN OF AN END OF A TREND IS the Primary problem of paradox I think.
THE TURN OF AN END OF A TREND IS the Primary problem of paradox I think.
We don't attempt and predict trends. Instead we trade in that direction from the beginning to the ending and partake that we've recognized. While approval of a fashion's presence is explored through a variety of analytical measures, nobody can identify a trend's start or end until it becomes a subject of a document.
A Fantastic system must have shed trade This Isn't a ashamed thing, however if some 1 dont respect any losing , he should brag
You cannot forecast if Smart Money will Stop Selling or Stop Buying.
You don't need to comply with the Price when they Stop Selling BUY whenever they Stop Buying SELL you will simply be wrong once in every Trend.
The following thing is being able to ch sight of a Balanced Market early so you aren't being bounced about like a rubber band.
yes man ,this is what I mean,however people who learn the system doesn't admire any error that make me sad.
Hello Liun,
It's about finding a set of principles that are easy to follow and repeatable.
As long as you make no errors after your collection of simple rules you will succeed, however you will have Losing Trades
Ah but waves do show the weakness or strength of this movement and exhaustion of price continuing that motion.
The point was to show when price has reached 5 waves in a motion it becomes a considerably lower probable trade to continue to exchange the trend and a trader should steer clear of these moves. Sorry I was not very clear.
Have you heard of Elliott wave theory? It is a means for determining the strength or weakness of price movement in a trend before you will find a retracement or reversal.