question about money management
1 2 3

thread: question about money management

  1. #1
    Member Ameny's Avatar
    83

    question about money management

    Hello, ive crimson this material somewhere but cant find it again so perhaps people here know what I mean / asking about.


    Somehere I red that when you lose, you should be in smaller pos dimensions, and when you win you should incrase?

    How does this work in practice? Say that my typical pos size is 2%, and when I lose one time that the next transaction will only bee in 1 percent and if I lose that the next will be 0,5? And if that's a win I go up to 1 percent again?

    Plus this is the system, does it have some title so I can google it?

    I hope you get what iam thinking about, sorry for bad english

    /kind regard!

  2. #2
    Member Ameny's Avatar
    83
    Yes sir! That part I understand, but ive read that you should cut back on your bet dimensions more.

    If u got 100 on my account , and losing 1 percent its 1unit, then if I shed second wager on 1 percent is going to be 0,99 unit. So its a decrease,
    but what I red it should be a bigger decrease, such as 0,5 the new time, or is this wrong tecnuiqe?

  3. #3
    Yes sir! Ive read that you ought to cut back on your bet size more, although that part I know. If u got 100 in my account , and losing 1% its 1unit, after that if I shed next wager on 1% is going to be 0,99 unit. So its a decrease, but what I red it ought to be a larger decrease, like 0,5 the new time, or is this wrong tecnuiqe?
    Then that are your own choice depending on your personal trading risk and fashion.

  4. #4
    Member Ameny's Avatar
    83
    I know, thought that egy have some sort of title so I can google it and learn about it, iam pretty new to trading and would like to become defensive player.

  5. #5
    In case you double your bet when you win... it's called anti-martingale.

    In the event that you split in half your bet when you lose.... Nicely... wth is that? Perhaps you're the inventor. . So give it a title

    I would call it the anti-anti-martingale.

  6. #6
    Junior Member CRISUOX's Avatar
    22
    Unfortunately, I am not certain about the title of this system but I've thing really much like FerruFX said, its automatic substances. Just like in the event that you have 100 USD and you have 1 percent risk and the funds rises to 200 USD, which means that your risk is obviously 1% only but the wages increases. I guess that is mentioned above and you mentioned you knew it, according to rest that is entirely on how comfortable you are using higher/lower risk.

  7. #7
    You guys didn't get what he implies. . He wants to grow the risk per trade when he wins . eg. He stakes 1... win, next trade he stakes 2.

    IMO it makes sense if you want to bring some ganbling fun to your trading and you're all set to blow the account.

  8. #8
    Member niko's Avatar
    56
    Position size its directly Associated with win of whatever egy You're using; if You've Got a Higher win rate you can use a Higher Percent position size with no problems at all on the Long Term

  9. #9
    ... in case you've got a higher win rate you can use a larger % position dimensions with no problems whatsoever on the long run
    High win rate does not make the system profitable. Winrate R:R does ...

    - 99 percent winrate : you can be a loser
    - 1% winrate : you can be a winner

    The above is determined by the R:R.

  10. #10
    The first step in Strategy growth BEFORE we present any MM would be to guarantee egy has extended term with no MM. Without MM to me means position sizing of MINLOT or 1xAccountBalance() or even 1xAccountEquity()

  •