Forex expert vr smart grid lite develop

[van]

Can you provide a system for calculating lots for a community of 10 or more orders ? I do courses about working with networks of orders in the language, are you curious to view them ? Maybe there is a person who can translate them to English

Voldermar, your translator is messing up the meaning of these words.
Can you mean you want to compute lot size for a group of orders?

That I might already have something - I want to know what you have in mind.

[Evaalba198]

quote Wow 2.21 is frightful

True, true. .

Whatever you need is big enough account HAHAHA:

[van]

quote Done Analyzing for Now (demo); final Outcome (maximum lot size has been 2.21 lot): Picture

Wow 2.21 is Frightful

[Evaalba198]

quote Hi Rockit May I know if your are testing it on Demo or actual? If then just how much deposit? 154 Euro is lot in couple hours using default setting of 0.01.

Done testing for today (demo); final result (maximum lot size has been 2.21 lot):

[jttejttin]

18-46 is basically MA based entry. - but iMA - both are 13 and 13 with median 1 5. So gap is too little. BB also both are alike. 18-47 - monitoring stop. However, Martingale settings aren't inside. IPointStepLoss isn't setup. And there's absolutely no entry rule. Just open buy if open and 0 market if 0 So, it opens the orders randomly. So, both versions, am sure more of reference points for the Code to be included into other versions.

So according to you, so far that variant has better mode of entry?

[jttejttin]

quote Currently doing forward test of 18-46 on E/U, default configurations, since only before London open (now); heading good, banked ? Now 154 much. Thus far the robot went to up to 0.86 lots with a 1.6 multiplier.

Hi Rockit

May I know whether you're testing it on Demo or actual? If then just how much deposit? 154 Euro is lot in few hours with default setting of 0.01.

[dammen]

18-46 is essentially MA based entrance. - however iMA - are 13 and 13 with median 1 5.
Consequently gap is too small.

BB also both are same.


18-47 - monitoring stop.

However, Martingale settings are not inside. IPointStepLoss is not setup.
And there is not any entry principle. Only open buy if open and 0 sell if 0
So, it opens the orders randomly.

Therefore, both versions, am sure more of reference points to the Code to be incorporated into other versions.

[van]

quote you may want to think about utilizing a 'safety valve' if you average down and utilizing Martingale positions. . Limit the number of ordinary down rankings, place breakeven level for most open positions and to reduce reduction after maximum positions open and market does not retrace. See this thread The Monty Hall .... Https://www.cliqforex.com/general-fo...-analysis.html image

rather intriguing.

Is this something which you've experimented with, with consistent success?

It's a route that I have become and it feels like we are on the very same rails. Maybe.

[Andrearuiz150497]

Limiting the expiration of a demonion version can turn out to be counter productive as 2 weeks is a really short time to forward test anything. Nobody will be able to resell your compiled demo version.

[turuxxserraoxrc87]

quote @:Just a question: are you working on this issue described here. I would like to perform backtests, if you've got a solution. Thank you. Renko

I am today writing a great algorithm, I am worried about the question that the code wouldn't go on the market, that wouldn't be cheating.
As I'm preparing a movie for subscribers in the Russian language devoted to the networking of their orders.