Forex expert vr smart grid lite develop

[angel]

Fantastic day
I'm new here and I'm reading through the comments concerning the EA, if I'm not being out there how do I achieve it how does this work, I;m still new in trading and do not have expertise,
substantially appreciated.

[turuxxserraoxrc87]

This is a clean version with the feasibility of code opening sections https://www.cliqforex.com/general-fo...d-usd-uob.html

I must say there is a version of VR Smart Grid and this is a very different EA (that isn't advertising), please don't ask about him.

Now about the code
I have ungrouped the code to make it easier for you to experiment, and I am exactly the same. ))))
Inserted Code //************************************************** ***********// //*********************** One Step ****************************// //************************************************** ***********// if(b==0) if(OrderSend(Symbol(),OP_BUY,NormalizeDouble(iStar tLots,2),NormalizeDouble(Ask,Digits()),iSlippage,0 ,0,VR Setka Lite,iMagicNumber,0,clrGreen)lt;0) Publish(OrderSend mistake #,GetLastError()); if(s==0) if(OrderSend(Symbol(),OP_SELL,NormalizeDouble(iSta rtLots,2),NormalizeDouble(Bid,Digits()),iSlippage, 0,0,VR Setka Lite,iMagicNumber,0,clrGreen)lt;0) Publish(OrderSend mistake #,GetLastError()); //************************************************** ***********// //********************* Profit *****************************// //************************************************** ***********// if(bgt;0 iPointOrderStepProfitgt;0 (Ask-BuyPriceMax)gt;iPointOrderStepProfit*Point()) if(OrderSend(Symbol(),OP_BUY,NormalizeDouble(iStar tLots,2),NormalizeDouble(Ask,Digits()),iSlippage,0 ,0,VR Setka Lite,iMagicNumber,0,clrGreen)lt;0) Publish(OrderSend mistake #,GetLastError()); should(sgt;0 iPointOrderStepProfitgt;0 (SelPriceMin-Bid)gt;iPointOrderStepProfit*Point()) if(OrderSend(Symbol(),OP_SELL,NormalizeDouble(iSta rtLots,2),NormalizeDouble(Bid,Digits()),iSlippage, 0,0,VR Setka Lite,iMagicNumber,0,clrGreen)lt;0) Publish(OrderSend mistake #,GetLastError()); //************************************************** ***********// //********************** Drawdown *****************************// //************************************************** ***********// should(Close#91;1#93;gt;Open#91;1#93;-RRB- if(iPointOrderStepLossgt;0 bgt;0 (BuyPriceMin-Ask)gt;iPointOrderStepLoss*Point()) if(OrderSend(Symbol(),OP_BUY,NormalizeDouble(iStar tLots,2),NormalizeDouble(Ask,Digits()),iSlippage,0 ,0,VR Setka Lite,iMagicNumber,0,clrGreen)lt;0) Publish(OrderSend mistake #,GetLastError()); should(Close#91;1#93;lt;Open#91;1#93;-RRB- if(iPointOrderStepLossgt;0 sgt;0 (Bid-SelPriceMax)gt;iPointOrderStepLoss*Point()) if(OrderSend(Symbol(),OP_SELL,NormalizeDouble(SelL ot,2),NormalizeDouble(Bid,Digits()),iSlippage,0,0, VR Setka Lite,iMagicNumber,0,clrGreen)lt;0) Publish(OrderSend mistake #,GetLastError()); //************************************************** ***********// //************************************************** ***********// //************************************************** ***********//

[aran610]

There seems to be also a problem with TP on xBest3.48. It is taking small profits on every trade and adjusting the TP value from the ea settings does not make any difference. Perhaps there's a setting from the ea that would resolve the matter but I haven't managed to find it. In the image you can see how it has left two market trades available and have opened multiple other market trades that have been closed separately with a little profit. image

Is Experiment

[Andrearuiz150497]

There seems to be also an issue with TP on xBest3.48. It is taking small profits on each trade and adjusting the TP worth from the ea configurations does not make any difference. Perhaps there's a setting from the ea that would solve the issue but I have not managed to find it.
From the image you can see the way that it's left two market trades available and have opened several other market trades that have been closed separately with a little profit.

[dammen]

Voldermar, take a look at the EA. There's enough already implemented and the egy is like yours but with just two separate engines document file

Yes rodolfolm xBest is very fine- similar BUY SELL alternative engines handling both sides trades.

Only difference I see is xBest is Martingale hedge.

VR 1843 is Martingale as well profit grid builder.

Whenever there's profit, building the grid to improve on the profit.

Great to see 2 like minded coders coming together. Great work.

We'll achieve something.

My Analysis of VR 18_43 EA-


Logic of open order based on momentum BUY alternative SELL is amazing.
If Close[1]gt;open[1] it unlocks a buy order. And Close[1]lt;Open[1] then sell order. Which is based on momentum.

1. There is hedge directly from begining. - It would really open 1 buy and more or less next 2- 3 candles it'd open alternative sell.

2. There's Profit Grid along with loss grid. - reduction grid is martingale, Profit grid is Scaling In- Improving on profit.

(if you see for EU UJ - I made profit grid- 390 stoploss grid- 720)
so when there is profit grid increases with additional order, and loss grid declines in adding additional rankings as there is gap in step sizes.

So where pip worth on 5 digits 3 digits currency pairs. This works. Profit builds larger and opp grid is significantly slower in launching positions.
This is great.

But I would like to shut when we reach complete profit one facet. All orders.

Might be that way, we can limit drawdown far better.

But, I believe this one could do the job. Mathematically, if we can get the proper amounts, it is going to do the job nicely.

[aran610]

quote Which are the changes between 3.48 and 3.47?

Is similar it had been just 1 experiment

[turuxxserraoxrc87]

Voldermar, take a peek at this EA. There is enough already implemented and also the egy is similar to yours but using just two separate engines document file

it is a big code, it is quite old. I hope it makes it possible to earn. .

[van]

Voldermar, have a peek at the EA. There is enough already employed and also the egy is similar to yours but using two separate engines file file

What will be the changes between 3.48 and 3.47?

[aran610]

Voldermar, have a look at this EA. There is enough already employed along with the egy is similar to yours but with two separate engines
https://www.cliqforex.com/attachment...39305792366.48
https://www.cliqforex.com/attachment...31895646077.48

[dammen]

Today the logic is if shut[1]gt;available[1] it opens a buy order. And Close[1]lt;Open[1] then sell order. Which is based on momentum.


When there is a filter then it would make far greater work. What should you think.

Like lively profits or zigzag indior. This way, we can have small trends and logic can apply on precisely the exact same basis.

what do you say?

Update:

Including a filter on this EA Isn't good at all. How it stands in the moments seems to work better. Dynamic advantages filter has been added by me. Terrible outcomes.

I have attached the filter logic on this. Not worth testing. However, for code reference, I have supplied the EA with filter option.
https://www.cliqforex.com/attachment...3495793455.mq4
https://www.cliqforex.com/attachment...1383123443.ex4
https://www.cliqforex.com/attachment...1486705744.mq4