Forex expert vr smart grid lite develop -
1 2 3 4 12 ...

thread: Forex expert vr smart grid lite develop

  1. #11
    Senior Member aaac82's Avatar
    109
    ... I tried to describe this on alternative buy sell. And close all the orders both BUY SELL based on basket profit at level. Inside this example. AveragePrice(which can be Breakeven) minimalprofit Just if it's coded, we can see it's a feasible idea. Manually we cant check for scenarios.
    Until I do this, maybe you'll check if my (BE)formulation is mathematically accurate.

    If so, you can trade fairly risk-free with good trend egies.

  2. #12
    quote Hi, Do you know any brokers who are supplying zero hedge margin and also no swap? Please share the info. Thanks
    yes. I'm using one but I'm not formally related to them. I will PM you. Thanks

  3. #13
    quote In case your beginning lot 0.01, try utilize 0.16 or 0.32 I did evaluations even with the utmost lot 0.04 - interesting results. This, of course, will help to maneuver the problematic market positions, but the main alternative - would be hedging at some value of a drawdown, however that requires a certain change of algorithm... Now I am experimenting with the EA code.
    Yes, you are right. DD is not as but so are the profits. 20% each year. (900 Euro on 3000 Investment)

  4. #14
    18-46 is essentially MA based entrance. - but iMA - are 13 and 13 with median 1 5. So gap is too little. BB additionally both are alike. 18-47 - monitoring stop. However, Martingale settings aren't inside. IPointStepLoss is not setup. And also there is no entry rule. Just open buy if 0 and open sell if 0 So, it opens the orders randomly. So, both versions, am sure more of reference points for the Code to be incorporated into other variants.
    According to Voldemar227 , there's error on your 18.431 18.441 (he mentioned on page 7).
    According to you, 18.46 18.47 has entrance and martingale problems.

    Previous models dont have Lot Multiplier alternative for martingale trades. So it means there isn't any version released to test cent account?

  5. #15
    quote INitial Martingale remains running and we're continuing to start BUY orders. At what level will we be when we start launching SELL order.
    Alright Look
    0,10 lots Buy orders and 0.15 lots sell orders disaster

  6. #16
    quote that he seems to use google translate from english to russian to understand what was written. Suggestion he's creating is: (am copying and pasting the material). In the image above, I have circled the biggest problem for us today in the downtrend. The trades which are furthest away from the current market price. These are causing the biggest problem because they are so many pips away in the market and most hard to recover. These trades are. You might believe that the newest martingale trades are the biggest problem because...
    #1059; #1085;#1072;#1089; #1077;#1089;#1090;#1100; 5 #1086;#1088;#1076;#1077;#1088;#1086;#1074; #1087;#1086; 0,01 #1083;#1086;#1090;#1091; #1080; #1086;#1076;#1080;#1085; #1089;#1077;#1083; #1083;#1086;#1090;#1086;#1084; 0,05 #1088;#1099;#1085;#1086;#1082; #1088;#1072;#1079;#1074;#1077;#1088;#1085;#1077;#1 090;#1089;#1103;.
    #1052;#1099; #1079;#1072;#1082;#1088;#1086;#1077;#1084; #1074;#1089;#1077; 5 #1073;#1072;#1081; #1086;#1088;#1076;#1077;#1088;#1086;#1074; #1085;#1086; #1095;#1090;#1086; #1084;#1099; #1073;#1091;#1076;#1077;#1084; #1076;#1077;#1083;#1072;#1090;#1100; #1089; #1089;#1077;#1083; #1086;#1088;#1076;#1077;#1088;#1086;#1084; #1083;#1086;#1090;#1086;#1084; 0,05 ?

  7. #17
    The drawdown is, not good

  8. #18
    USDJPY, starting lot 0.1, Martingale multiplier 2.0, Maximal Lots=0.8, H1. Test is from 2017.01.09 to date.



  9. #19
    Member van's Avatar
    32
    quote Not certain why they do not wish to get it done or not try any new ideas but at least now I can see that there's more talk about hedging also on the opposite martingale threads. I've also a few times asked them to allow adding transactions to the winning side because this could behave as hedging and could be simple to implement. Above I've posted the hedging sample: for example if we've sell transactions 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 and 0.5 and the Dollar 1.5, Let us assume that at precisely the exact same time we would have been opening buy transactions as follows: 0.1, 0.1, 0.1, 0.1, and 0.1...
    I do not think it's an issue of difficulty. There are enough coders.
    It's whether or not the good coders believe the effort is well worth it.

    A hedge to get a martingale is essentially another martingale constructed on top of the 1st martingale. There is no way to describe this. Is it tricky to code this? No. Is it worth the while? Maybe. And like most of martingales, it requires a big enough balance and the right tools to trade this with. I've described my thoughts on this in additional martingale threads and my opinion remains the same. I've coded out a proof of concept with this grail in mind however, the risks remain.

    I believe more testing has to be performed (XAUUSD: No black dots = range egy, black dots = tendency egy happens over)
    I love the idea of collaborative thinking. Keep these thoughts coming guys, we may come up with something good!

  10. #20
    Member Sireh's Avatar
    43
    Perhaps adding about what TraderTero stated above about adding on to winning side, I actually enjoy the idea of taking profits on the way in order to reduce the current weight loss reduction. I suggested this to pipbeast ea , no idea what happened to the man after he ended the ea... But maybe it can be of some use here. I really do apologise as I do not have sufficient expertise to code this however.

    Hello, I had the same question when I had been trading manually. What I ended up with is after the hedge, why just not restart from small lots again and again close some of the reduction with profits obtained.
    This is how it works: Floating hedge -$200 (or as defined by user) and a 'pay-per-click %', for example set it to 20%. Now when a successful trade is created, 20% of these profits is employed to close a number of their reduction. So a successful $5 trade, $4 will be banked and $1 will cancel $1 out of reduction. Placing the 'pay-off' value to 100% will mean that $5 of profit will be used to offset the reduction. Please let me know what you think. This may scale from the reduction.

    So, bottom line _______ is that, it may be possible to add additional lots to winning side in order to take a few slow profits to scale from the reduction side. Then just wait for the set Equity TP to hit with the desired profit earlier.
    Best Regards,

  •