thread: Micro martingale with small capital

quote Hello , try standard settings, but I advise you to put virtual_pending to true, otherwise it is possible that you get trading mistakes which can lead to loss trades.

Thanks, I'll set it. Right now I examine EU,UJ and EG. I eliminated GU because it appears to get large spread in three brokers I use ( and all 3 are ecn with reduced disperse comission). Do you advice any other pair to trade or those are good?

Hello to everybody, now I started FT in demo with 3 different brokers and depending the results I will test additionally in real accounts. Only a little help please, I saw good results results at both DEMO and REAL accounts. Did everyone use default configurations with different signal for EU,UJ,EG? Or is there somebody who used totally different settings with profit? Thank you

Hello ectaco, attempt regular settings, but I suggest that you place virtual_pending to true, otherwise it is likely that you get trading mistakes which can lead to loss trades.

Hello to everyone, now I began FT in demo with 3 different brokers and based the outcomes I will test also in actual accounts. Only a little help, I saw good results results at both DEMO and REAL accounts. Did everyone use default configurations with different signal for EU,UJ,EG? Or is there somebody who used different settings with profit? Thank you

quote Small signal is not possible to be released like this, something compelled. Unless used fun while looking at market conditions, assisted with On / Off. Focus on Signal that is regular, to be applied following Pair and broker attributes, and modifiion with other parameters.

If it wasn't for GBPUSD, Revo could have made 30% gain now with EURUSD and USDJPY - today it's 0 gain/loss.

Anyhow, this is a GREAT result, I simply have to optimize it for GBPUSD or utilize only 1 pair at a time.

Let us see if Micro can be substituted for the same fantastic performance.

quote At least for GBPUSD little signal is too dangerous for me personally with Micro, although it is good in BT. Have not tried with Revo yet. With Micro I will try with greater signal to determine if it looks BT outcomes. There shouldn't be any trading mistakes anymore due to virtual_pending.

Small signal isn't feasible to be published just like that, something compelled. Unless used fun while looking at market conditions, aided with On / Off.
Focus on regular Signal, to be implemented following Pair and broker characteristics, and modifiion with different parameters.

My TrendSignal is 10 ending SL =10 end another #1072;#1088;#1077; defolt. Yes, there are only purchases on the real account - if it be?

Yeah right, Trend_Signal at high speed there are limitations with slippage. If Trend_Signal is not busy, the candle does not occur transactions.

In this case, Trend _Signal = 10, will OP Buy at the candle span around 14-16. If default 6 will probably be OP Buy at Nighttime span around 9-11.
In the case Aside from the above, to avoid malfunction Trade is disable (we can not ch the price), we advoe utilizing Virtual_Pending = true

My TrendSignal is 10 end SL =10 end another #1072;#1088;#1077; defolt. Yes, you'll find only buys on the actual account - if it be?

Why are you surprised? Should I never use Revo? Revo gave me a much better effect on test and I am with Stoplos = 10. There are no mistakes in the log. And the one I didn't understand. The problem is è Take operations.

Alright I know.

On your account BUY trades.

Sorry don't use Signal_Trend (fill 0), for Trend if the state be OP at Candle length reaching 9-10, but pushed upwards due to Slippage.
Indeed in high speed in trending, slippage isn't easy to control (In BT that there isn't any Slippage).

** Error Modifiion Pending_Order (Trade is disable), use Virtual_Pending = true

Why are you really surprised? Should I not use Revo? Revo gave me a better effect on test and I'm with Stoplos = 10. There are not any mistakes in the log. And the third one I did not know. The issue is è Require reverse operations.

Good Morning Mrgmrg, these are the outcomes of today's real account again -84.25 $ and the test 146.46$, the new one is that the real account carries Buy on the Sell test. Why can not I understand - perfect test results and horrible real account ??? Nice day image image

Oh you utilize Revo?

Revo is still readily touched SL if using Low SL (currently under investigation)
I utilize FT with Micro with OneWay = false, FT parallel 1 Live and 4 Display.

It may be well worth checking a couple of things

1. Is there an error in the Journal
2. SL is low
3. The Limit_Pending parameter (0.2) is raised to 0.8