thread: Micro martingale with small capital

quote ok that is now very clear. My thoughts this are the best pairs using low spread: EURUSD=0.2 pips GBPUSD=0.4 USDJPY=0.2 EURJPY=0.4 EURAUD=0.2 But hazard pair AUDUSD=0.2 But hazard pair AUDCHF=0.3 USDCHF=0.4 All other are to high my mind. Come to MaxSlippage = 4. I believe here is the same ? 40 Pips ? I believe to better opportunity to win, is return with Slippage. I believe better is set to 1 (10pips). Because the risk if you buy to high, and the cource return is to large. So lower is better. right ?

Good Spreads yoir broker.

Max_Slopage 4 pips (40points)
Slipage typical about 1 pips (10 points).
Because EA is Reversal, slipage 1-2 pips is relatively secure and likely not long.
Until the Order entry follows the trend direction, occasionally slipage can be pushed around 10 pips or more (if in very long candle)

quote All ideal Max_Spreads 1.5 (15 points), is the highest disperse enabled for Order entry, needs to be adjusted to the average spreads on Pair utilized (eg GJ approximately 0.9 - 1.3 pips)

ok this is now clear.
My thoughts this will be the best pairs using low spread:
EURUSD=0.2 pips
GBPUSD=0.4
USDJPY=0.2
EURJPY=0.4
EURAUD=0.2 But danger pair
AUDUSD=0.2 But danger pair
AUDCHF=0.3
USDCHF=0.4

These are to my thoughts.

Now come to MaxSlippage = 4. I believe here is exactly the same ? 40 Pips ? I believe to better Chance to win, is return with Slippage. I believe better is set to 1 (10pips).
Since the risk if you buy to high, and the cource return would be to large. So lower is greater. right ?

quote to get 100% understanding. 10 Points = 1 Pip. Right ? If we've in BT the Spread with 2 Points, then it's 0,2 Pips, right ? In Micro EA is your Default MaxSpread= 1.5 pips. This is then 15 Factors ? Is this correct ? If yes, then is in EA the 1.5 pips too much.

All right
Max_Spreads 1.5 (15 points), is the maximum disperse enabled for Order entry, Has to Be adjusted to the average spreads on Pair used (eg GJ about 0.9 - 1.3 pips)

quote From the parameter, all of its components are Pips (not points), except proportions. Interior BT are Points. At the top display, in Points.

To get 100% comprehension.
10 Points = 1 Pip. Right ?

If we've in BT the Spread with two Points, then it's 0,2 Pips, right ?

In Micro EA is the Default MaxSpread= 1.5 pips. That is then 15 Factors ?

Is this right ? If yes, then is in EA the 1.5 pips too much.

mrgmrg, you recall we were talking about the impact of faster ping time. Your EA, is tremendously affected by the speed of launching of the order. As it takes high spikes and retracting. Lower the ping time around the VPS, the better it'd take orders. What I have discovered, it does pick up good trades. TrailStart- 30 - Trail Step- 5 TrailStart_2 2.3 - TrailingStep_2 2.0 Results change quite differently. Total of number of transactions to the identical period change from that of default settings- 682 trades vs 212 trades. My VPS ping time is 11.7ms and it didnt...

What's your Broker, and who is your VPS Provider ?
Please have a look into your Journal on VPS. Scroll down, and check if you have some Lost Connection.

quote There shouldn't be any issue with naming the pair, in Justforex every pair there is addition .ecn

I examine it. It's working with the pair plus there extra Point at end.

Hi mrgmrg Just would like to know whether you could inform us what indiors are in your EA because we can't see your source code. The main reason I ask is because the gap between BT and live trading are completely different. I have attached 2 BT 1 on 1 and live on demo account on a VPS same settings same broker except live runs at 1ms and demonion at 18ms. I know 90% BT is inaccurate but my beginning balance was $300 and in 1 year moved to $20 million and in live trading profits are modest if any. Even with 90% BT I have not seen that kind of a difference...

Logic is something to do with Spikes in trade amounts.

So faster link and faster CPU makes a good utilization of the EA. Slower relationship, the reduction would be fast.

The purpose we get good lead to Backtest is because - We done deal with slow fast connection. Even with information of tick data suite- it will replie the slow and fast connections. So entrance points are good, but for that you want very quick connection and also fast reactive CPU(VPS).

Since there are too fast modify running virtually every tick. Thus, it ought to be quick enough to manage it.

IF those are good, This is very excellent EA. Sure shot at winner.

Hi Just want to know if you could inform us what indiors are in your EA because we cannot see your source code. The main reason why I ask is because the gap between BT and live trading are entirely distinct. I have attached 2 BT 1 on 1 and live on demo account on a VPS same settings same broker except reside runs at 1ms and demo at 18ms. I know 90 percent BT is inaccurate but my starting balance was $300 and in 1 year went to $20 million and in live trading profits are small if any. Even with 90 percent BT I have never seen that kind of a gap...

Hi lindrich

This EA does not use an indior unless the BB_Period content is not 0 then utilize the Bolinger Bands indior as an extra filter.
Previously tried with several indiors (from MT4 and external indior) However ... the outcome is not good and also make EA load becomes slow.

Simple to know EA Utilizing indior or not.
After back evaluation, then Open Chart. From the chart right click select Indior List and will reveal all of the indiors utilized by EA (if any).

Hi mrgmrg

Just want to know whether you could tell us exactly what indiors are in your EA because we cannot view your source code. The main reason I ask is because the gap between BT and live trading are entirely distinct. I have attached 2 BT 1 on 1 and live on demo account on a VPS same settings same broker anyhow live operates at 1ms and demonion in 18ms.
I understand 90 percent BT is inaccurate but my beginning balance was $300 and in 1 year moved to $20 million and in live trading profits are small if any. Even with 90 percent BT I have not seen this sort of a gap on another EA between BT and live account unless there are repainting indiors in your EA. I hope you don't take this the wrong way and your EA dosnt have repainting indiors but want to describe this before myself or others may lose any money.

Thanks

quote appears like different broker different outcome different backtest also no way of knowing

Yes, exactly the same broker with a different internet connection results can also be different. However, it should not be much difference.
For Pair matches are GBPUSD, EURUSD, USDJPY, GBPJPY, EURGBP, USDCHF.
But the Majority of the transactions are GBPxxx

Now result live