I was just 1-2. Plus it all error above.
No, it is not my statement. It came out of this particular post, the first sentence, that is what I was quoting in my post:
https://www.cliqforex.com/trading-sy...-intraday.html
Hii
Sorry it seems to be your statement for the term In a strong Trend it kills the Account, like every martingale System
Hii jdieieh
Thank you for sharing the explanation.
This EA can be flexible, Full Martingale or Partial Martingale or Combine Martingale and ordinary.
In Backtest With Setting Signal_Levelgt; = 8 and Margin_Percent 1 percent and with Long StopLoss (eg 1000) run 5 years with $ 500 capital still can generate large Profit and Profit Factor above 5, no colaps.
Btw whatever the expression, the same aim is to achieve Profit large.
The decision is up to User, choose configurations.
This statement isn't right. It's easy to design system which operates excellently in powerful trends and struggles in ranges. Or vice versa. Or anything versa. It's not a egy per se that somehow does neglect because powerful trend.
Actually it is possible to design martingale system, with no extravagant variety of losses in row, which will operate for years with reasonable opportunity to succeed. The one issue with this kind of a system which profits are (still) not worth risk, finally all martingale will neglect, it is a matter of time... But, what system doesn't fail in very long term (long as sample size, no time)?
Only a clarifiion, so you can consider it and try truly know what are you doing. Does it make sense?