IT seems to me you have a good grasp on your own personality and the trading method necessary to fit. Good luck to you.
IT seems to me you have a good grasp on your own personality and the trading method necessary to fit. Good luck to you.
Risk how little or much. 1% keeps you in longer to bleed. Higher% risk are not any fun for many others. Keep putting them there where put your stops.
[quote=;5745491]Evidently not if this thread is anything to go by, but that is classic coming from somebody who advoes 1:1
lol, commerce demo for 6 weeks, are you serious?!?
I've got a better idea, rather than throw out ridiculous challenges why don't you answer the questions which were asked? No, I did not think so, it's easier to change focus and blow smoke.
Okay how about this for an idea, you exchange demonstration for 6 weeks and assume I take the opposite side of your transactions. Come back in 6 weeks and let's see where we're.
Live afterward!
Only need to show you that other people are able to exchange another R:R and have similar outcomes. That is common sense and sensible and straight to the point.
The entire reason were here can somebody who transactions a 1:1 R:R receive exactly the same gains as somebody who deals 2:1 3:1. That's the question it's been loud and clear all I have done is yes a individual can. Considering that the skillset is precisely the same.
You've arrived here and naysayed that the thought that a individual with a 1:1 ratio will not perform as well as a person who enables there winners to ride.
Well I simply disagree I believe that when a individual enters the market he understands the rationale of the reason he enters and has assembled his take profits and prevent losses around his entry. He must understand what risk reward functions best for his or her entry. And no best risk reward is not always allow the winners ride. Plain and simple .
So I am not certain what your questions are I'm here to defend an open point of view which No 1 R:R matches for all.
I understand this because I have exchanged the range of risk rewards. The one thing which determines your risk reward is your entries. Your entries should be based around the risk your prepared to take not your profits. First find low risk entrances and mold that a take profit all around your risk.
All the stuff in between anything!
most of us know you're an awesome orderflow stop searching guy EE but in terms of your money control what would you do ? Just curious.
Or are you just reminding us how a miniature Darkstars are rippin it
Go for it, same applies, assume I am carrying another side of your trades. 6 months then, see you back here!
The remainder of your article is merely regurgitating what has already been discussed.
return and look....or don't. I doubt you'd have the ability to post a coherent response anyhow...
I concur keep putting your ceases there. That's where traders put there limit orders. Ha Ha!
Yo Cindy! I like to have fun here. Those guys tear up stuff.
Me personally. . I'm trying to put larger positions on more predictable trade results, and average in (w/ smaller positions) on moderate-looking trades. Some tops/bottoms have a spike immediately after to squeeze the front runners so a typical in tends to work. This is achieved on the 1min chart. Probably much different MM than the other thread participants.
Of course risk--0 is the goal after taking on a trade.
I will pass on searching for your own questions! If you don't want to re post them.
Have a great one Floyd! . You can call me Pac Man!
When your prepared to put your money where your mouth is let me know! I'm always prepared.