Yesbut you got the notion, right. What I mean is that I've occasionally seen people telling they've discovered a fantastic system simply because they backtested some transactions.:
Sorry, I'll be far more specific next time.
Okay, I'll be more specific, like previously.:
I ardently think that almost nothing in this world is random, and I say almost because there might be something that it's really random and I've just not known about it yet. If you know the specific variables and their values, you could always calculate what is going to take place.
The Exact Same applies to the market. You might actually predict every motion the market does, but it just has TOO many variables that you just can't place them all together into a formulation.
This is where its randomness come from.
Like I said, I'll be far more specific. I said that it's ALMOST random. I don't understand how to measure randomness, but I believed it would be clear enough.
The nearly randomness I'm talking about is that we can experiment a rally of 2000 pips every moment. It may happen. The market could stay still for 13 minutes just at this time. Who knows?
If the market was not that random, more than 5 percent of the traders would earn money with the market. And I state that 5% of the traders that actually earn money, are the individuals who actually understand that non-random region of the market.
SorryI didn't get you on this part.:
I explained the thing about the randomness above.:
Today, about the 50-50. Then what's the ratio? You might say It is dependent on a lot of variables to determine the ratio, after which I would say afterward, the most sensible thing to do is to simply take the only well known variable we have: the market only rises or only drops, then the ratio would be 50-50.
You could also say it depends on how's the market acting, if it's going down, the most secure thing to do would be to market. But how the hell are you going to understand what the market will do precisely after you place your transaction? Maybe you see that the market is heading down, which means you place a sell order. You place also a 50 SL and a 50 TP. The market could move up 60 points and fall for 300 points. You're right, but you couldn't predict the market was going to catch up 60 points .
The RANDOM role in ALMOST RANDOM means it might happen whatever from the market at any given moment. The ALMOST part means we could be quite certain the market isn't going to rally for just one million pips for the next 2 seconds.
Oh my God, are you angry or something? This is only like, whenever someone says guy, this really is the very best metal band EVER and you say ya, it's the right for you. That just doesn't sound polite.:
I believed it would be clear that... well, clearly it isn't the supreme strategy. If it was, everyone would be thanking me personally and I'd find the market nobel prize.
Additionally, that you have so far noticed part really made me feel awful. It looks like if you were telling me ya, you've been trading for 5 minutes, and that's the best you've got so far, fantastic try though. Maybe you'll say something like I didn't mean that, don't take it private, but I simply don't expect somebody with the word humble in his signature to state something like this.
I also expect you to realize it's evident that everything being submitted on this thread will probably be relative to every individual, and not complete. Each individual has it's own trading style, some folks like to scalp, some others like to utilize mysticism to commerce, I don't understand. And all these approaches will probably be felt like the greatest system for them. We are going to get excited about what we have worked and learned, and try to convince others because we would like to HELP OTHER PEOPLE.
