100$ --gt100,000$ (period: 12 months) -
... 3 11 12 13 14 15 ...

thread: 100$ --gt100,000$ (period: 12 months)

  1. #121
    Junior Member Gduard's Avatar
    26
    interesting thread. Would it be easier with $1000 instead then $100....but thats not the point I suppose.

  2. #122
    WOW , you have got a really big signature
    Mind shrinking it down a few lines ?
    Yeah, no problem. As that is my first article, I didn't realise how big it would actually be. All fixed now.

  3. #123
    Junior Member MOHA33's Avatar
    29
    I really do not see your proposal as impossible, However I do see it as improbable. It is going to require either alot of luck skill, or a combination of both. I'm assuming you'll be using large leverage and many if not all your margin, and that means you will need to avoid any losses. I hope that you keep us all updated, and will following this diary.



    P.S. I hope you actually achieve this, and the luck for you.
    WOW Money gt; Pip, you have a really big touch
    Mind shrinking it down a few lines ?

  4. #124
    You remind me of a dude who offered everything and borrowed every thing he could and bet 100K pounds in Las Vegas on black. Just that he had more chances than you

  5. #125
    This is what potential. Look at my article yestarday, I was braging about making 120 percent in 24 hours once. Well here is documanted instance for last 24 hours. I created 20 percent of my account in 24 hours. With scalping in about 20 trades or so it's.
    Obiviously, it isn't everyday you can get like that but when it posible once or twise you then can do your best to make it often sufficient.

    Good luck to everybody.

    This is a great target $100 to $100000. The thing is newbies have something good and pro guys for most part do not have it. It's ability to think big.
    It's achivable? I belive so.
    One way to do it, be a great scalper (long term trader does not have any chance to do it my opinion even in wildest fantasies).
    Just how long is it going to take for a terrific scalper? This is just another question.
    I my best day ( and I am by no means even close to even good scalper, let alone great scalper ), doing scalping I was able to maximize my account on 120 percent in 24 hours.
    Now it was the best day for me. One day from 4.5 months, that I am using the same egy. All I have to do is make like this in another 4 months!
    Also my 120 percent is nothing compear into a man who did more then 800% in 24 hours. Some guy posted his transactions during those 24 hours in tread Scalpers proceed here, I am not sure if this Transaction history is still there, however the man literally did around hundred transaction and at the end of the 24 hours that he end up with $8000 (started with $1000)
    So if things like that posible then $100 gt; $100.000 sould be possible also.
    One thing of warrning however, scalping is for everybody but to master it requires many months and maybe many years until you can get results like this.

  6. #126
    Junior Member MOHA33's Avatar
    29
    You are right but I find it tough to maintain a w70% ratio. I guess its because im a newcomer. Im still learning though

    Additionally, can you explain Dynamic Reward Ratios and Dynamic Postion Sizing .
    Both DRR and DPS techniques are usually applied when trader has already entered the trade and wishes to maximise overall profitability of the machine, at precisely the same time improving general numbers like Winning%, R:R ratio, Average drawdown.

    This kind of techniques are also feasible to program, hovever that requires a lot of job (at least for me personally, because I really don't know MQL or other programming language) as many more factors, IF's THEN's and ELSE's are included. So I feel confident saying such type of trade management involves optional traders.

    DRR (Dynamic Bonus Ratio) is strictly dependant on time and price. A good example of this would be moving STOP LOSS to the candle's or bar's low everytime it closes when trader goes.

    DPS (Dynamic Position Sizing) is strictly dependant on time, therefore it involves cutting or adding down the position (but not closing it entirely) as certain price levels are attained.

    I hope this helps, and hopefully some other time I'll post more information on this

  7. #127
    Most of the folks atcliqforexare seriously interested in what they do. THEY DON'T HAVE TIME and THEY DON'T FIND IT SERIOUS to post about something that never occurred. Additionaly they know they cannot lie to themselves. So it makes no point at all :
    OK then, let us wait and see. If this individual makes it100k who knows, maybe people will be interested in buying his signs?

    I'm not really knowledgeable aboutcliqforexso perhaps I'm barking up the wrong tree.

    Z

  8. #128
    There can be a R :R of 1:1, however if TS has a% of 78 percent or greater, it will earn money, not to mention Dynamic Reward Ratios, Dynamic Postion Sizing and Trade control techniques that can have an excellent effect upon certain TS.

    I'm a discretionary trader, and honestly, there were just a couple times where my R:R ratio was just 1:1.

    Let us wait for more transactions from W-M, then we ought to observe the average numbers
    you're correct but I find it difficult to keep a w70% percentage. I guess its because im a beginner. Im still learning though

    Also, can you describe Dynamic Reward Ratios and Dynamic Postion Sizing .

  9. #129
    Junior Member MOHA33's Avatar
    29
    Hello
    are you currently moderator of FF??
    Can I understand why my thread was transfered to part of Forex Beginner QA
    it is 2 times that moderator move this topic to Forex Beginner QA
    thanks alot
    No W-M, I am not a moderator here

    And, sadly, I cannot really answer you it was transferred to Forex Beginner QA ...

  10. #130
    Junior Member MOHA33's Avatar
    29
    The one issue I see here is the risking 14 pips to make 15 pips.
    With spreads, your risking 16 pips to make 15 pips.
    That's approximately 1:1 ratio.

    You are also setting T/P levels which will interfere with your from grabbing the larger moves


    I would highly advise that you target an average of 2:1 ratio. Because not every transaction will provide you 2:1 they key is AVERAGE. At times the market will provide you only 10 and you ch it. Other times, you could get 60 so that your average should come to be 2:1. Additionally if you win only half the time, you will still make money. Even if your losing 70 percent of your trades, your still at B/E

    I may be wrong but thats what I found works for me.
    Hi Xenjin, and thank you for the interesting post.

    What you have said is true, but it requires more numbers to determine profitability and expectancy of the trading platform.

    There can be a R 1:1, but if TS has a% of 78% or greater, it will make money, not to mention Dynamic Reward Ratios, Dynamic Position Sizing and Trade control methods which can have an excellent impact upon particular TS.

    I am a discretionary trader, and honestly, there were only a few times in which my R:R ratio was just 1:1.

    Let us wait for more trades from W-M, then we should see the average numbers

  •