Great work will you show me charts on how long it would require you to rule out the world.
Great work will you show me charts on how long it would require you to rule out the world.
Could you elaborate what part exactly did not work?
Can it be the simple fact that you adapted the EA to be very good at forecasting the past?
Can it be the simple fact you might not receive fills?
Swings stop you out?
Rollover?
Market conditions have changed drastically?
It'd be good to isolate the biggest problems when switching from backtesting to forwards testing.
I apologize if there's a thread this already, can you point me to it?
Yes, that is the reason why we should not feed the frenzy anytime a braggart comes in using a few off the wall killer way to wealth.
The market is very effective at killing the gamblers out there using $100 accounts. Those accounts would be the bread and butter of the bucket stores. They know you'll shed the minute you fund the account and I'd say it would not take long because no one in their mind that is feeble takes the time to deal with risk.
The mindset is always: It's only $100 risk? Who cares. It's too boring to think about doing it. You can't turn $100 outside if you do not think about capital preservation and into a $ 1000.
When it took you a month to turn $100 into $110... would you live with this?
Realize if you did so every month we're talking 120 percent ROE per year. ANY fund manager with a brain the size of a flea would give their right testicle first.
Forget the nonsense of turning $100 to $10,000 or more within one year. You won't ever accomplish that, there are things to spend your time in.
Or maybe he did reach his aim and appreciating Hawaii with a Mai Tai and two beautiful women.
The worst thing you can do in these sort of outdated threads would be look at the thread creator profile and find out they did not appear again, and last action is 2007... or the date that they posted. . It seems like it did not work for them.
I have to add I've only doubled my 'DEMO' account in 12 days.
Does that mean ANYTHING,I doubt it
Are we discussing That,MOST Items are POSSIBLE,but everything is Comparative (risk to Profit)
That my friends is 'IT'
Regards
KEN
This I believe is not a realistic target as we're human not machines
and variables of living come in as well as loses?
In case you work out the win to eliminate ratio
your more likely to lose than win
hence why you let profits run trim loses brief.
3 to 1 ration in wins is said to be the target
never entre trades on 1 to 1 ratio you ll never get into 100,000 thats for sure
You Are Going to be out and down
I commerce pull backs and follow the path of the fad
also seem at fib retracements and the climb of pa (price action)