Does Dukascopy take risk against their clients?
1 2

thread: Does Dukascopy take risk against their clients?

  1. #1
    Member ars1j's Avatar
    44

    Does Dukascopy take risk against their clients?

    Can anybody clarify this? They take risk contrary to their clients.

  2. #2
    Junior Member HOxd's Avatar
    29
    Agree, the Truth Is that the majority of the Brokers will first protect their liquidity providers

  3. #3
    Member ars1j's Avatar
    44
    So is dukascopy a trustable broker to place millions of dollars? They reveal volume and pricing at their platform....Does that make it clear enough?

  4. #4
    Member ars1j's Avatar
    44
    What is the minimum sum to invest in spot forex? It is not said on their website

  5. #5
    Junior Member carmenbervaz's Avatar
    20
    what's the minimal amount to invest in jpmorgan place FX? It's not said on their website
    I imagine that if you need to ask, you do not have it.

  6. #6
    Member ars1j's Avatar
    44
    Why is trader613 post removed?

  7. #7
    deleted by myself...

  8. #8
    Junior Member gandano02's Avatar
    28
    DearcliqforexForum readers, for some odd reason the following needs re-posting; here we go then again, sorry about this:



    Knowing what you can do, and what it's about is important, very, significant:

    May I have you read this :

    There is when seeking to trade electronically spot-FX, Bank and none-Bank liquidity. In those 2 types of liquidity you'll have Interest, also,'last look' provision-liquidity.

    With the perfect Broker setup/a authentic multi-bank trading place setup, you would like your trades STP'd lead to Bank liquidity (matching your order requests to'unpadded/core' pricing and without a'dealing-desk' intervention) such a setup is quite difficult to find, I'd say, almost hopeless, almost. (Rabobank now offer as being CCP for $500k-$1m accounts - but, you'll want to get your monthly T/O's otherwise you're not being considered as lucrative enough; we're of course talking Yards here.)

    Further, if you would like to really eliminate the last piece of'conflict of interest', you may want to build a separate Bank flow for your”in's” and another second segregated Bank flow for your”out's”. Bearing in mind that when building such, that you'll have competitive price streamers (ie Barx), less competitive ones(ie CS), as well as conservative ones also (ie Soc Gen). (but of course, this is taking the'removal of conflict of interest' to the intense, but depending on your trade rejection stats/trading egy, deemed necessary).

    You would like to have a platform/front-end which is able to provide you with the state of the art technologies allowing you to select to pick and choose that Bank streamer or LP - and, to have/ or, to not possess streamed none-Bank liquidity.

    In addition, you would like to think if you run a short-term egy if it truly is helpful to your trading executions to possess ECN liquidity - significance, also to be matched against other clients of your broker's heartbeat (client-to-client fitting ), and, generally speaking, to even allow entirely to be matched from none-bank liquidity.

    You wish to avoid at any price a broker that is unable to offer you transparent liquidity and above all, you want to avoid like the plague a broker that is in a position to match/has the ability to match your trades on his B-book/be your CP.

    You could ask, transparent tailor made liquidity can such be found? It can. Have a look at the screenshots that are attached.

    Transparency is the key. There are (just ) two'mainstream' platform-liquidity-aggregation-technology-providers that can and are able to provide you with such a performance - however, when moving farther into depth there really only remains one which is actually turning out to being'the real deal'. (I will not mention names( sorry)

    Again to sum this up, you want:

    - Raw pricing (no mark-up/'core' pricing executable streaming liquidity)
    - Time slicing/block set to a maximum of 100ms
    - Transparent liquidity
    - 4.1: Best being, being able to pick and choose one LP's
    - 4.2: Second best, using at least the ability to select between revealed and none-disclosed liquidity, to also mean, having the capability to choose between Bank and none-Bank liquidity
    - And also, not to be matched via HubGiveUp routing being able to select your CP/CP-hub routing.

    And finally, you absolutely want to give a further idea and another glance seeking to trade Futures (including mini's) via the CME.

    With best wishes,


    PS: you tell me now please after reading the above, where exactly does Dukascopy, or as a matter of fact, most of the'High Street' Brokerage houses fit in, or better said, fit the bill??


  9. #9
    I plan to change to stocks asap but for that my account must grow somewhat first
    I would not feel comfortable to trade stocks less than 20000? ...

  10. #10
    Junior Member Rikyvk's Avatar
    15
    DearcliqforexForum readers, for some odd reason the next demands re-posting; here we go then again, sorry about this:



    Knowing what you do, and what it's all about is vital, very, important:

    Can I have you ever read this :

    There's when looking to trade electronically spot-FX, Bank and none-Bank liquidity. Within those 2 types of liquidity you will have Actual Interest, and,'last look' provision-liquidity.

    With an ideal Broker setup/a true multi-bank trading venue setup, you would like your transactions STP'd direct to Bank liquidity...
    Very enlightening info!
    Thanks

  •