Help Needed to Debug Existing EA with proven egy -
... 6 14 15 16 17 18 26 ...

thread: Help Needed to Debug Existing EA with proven egy

  1. #151
    Junior Member Yeyocr's Avatar
    18
    Its been a very busy day for me and also the limited time I can set aside to check the EA now, here are my further observations in this moment in time: 1. After having analyzed few other pairs, I think just the gbpjpy fits the bill here - another pairs simply lack the volatility demanded. The pairs didn't reveal as promising a result as the pair. 2. So, I think maybe it is not sensible to use the EA to trade multiple pairs instead, I believe better to trade in a higher lot on the gbpjpy alone. 3. In my back-test...
    Take profit in EA (my set 50) pip or $?
    THX

  2. #152
    Junior Member Yeyocr's Avatar
    18
    quote TP is currently in $ not in pips
    over 70 pip
    GJ wih 0.01lot 1pip plus circa 0.091$
    70pip*0.91$=6.37$

  3. #153
    Senior Member Orduniik11's Avatar
    101
    Its been a very busy day for me and with the limited time that I can put aside to test the EA today, here are my further observations in this moment now:

    1. After having tested few different pairs, I think just the gbpjpy fits the bill here - the other pairs simply lack the volatility required. The other pairs did not reveal as promising an effect as the gbpjpy pair.

    2. So, I think maybe it isn't sensible to use the EA to trade numerous pairs instead, I think better to trade in a greater lot on the gbpjpy alone.

    3. From my back-test because the start of the thread - I could safely state ( as I had repeatedly said during the thread) that the base line/benchmark to get 'practically risk-free' trading in Hybrid Mode is $1,000 per 0.01 lot per pair traded - and realistically you can expect 50% to 70% return per year. I have pushed the limits and I can say that the max is 0.03 lot traded per pair per $1,000 (you should receive at least 100% return a year) - But most of these remains to be ahead tested.

    4. Better to take small profits ($20 to $50 per 1 lot traded) as it has the effect of quickly closing the trade cycle and thus avoiding potential deadlock scenarios.

    I will post this first.

  4. #154
    Junior Member Yeyocr's Avatar
    18
    Closed$

  5. #155
    Junior Member Dextroxs's Avatar
    27
    quote I have over 70 pips (6.45$ with 0.01 lot GJ pair),rather than shut the expert. What its difficulty? picture picture
    TP is in $ not in pips

  6. #156
    Junior Member Yeyocr's Avatar
    18
    Moore 100 pips rather than close


  7. #157
    Senior Member Orduniik11's Avatar
    101
    Magregus those of you who had obviously never bothered to read this thread properly,

    When Swingman stated he is on the way to the bank, its supposed to be taken in a light hearted manner - ie it is intended to be a light hearted JOKE!!! Don't take it literally. No one should trade this EA reside nonetheless, at least not at this time. We got a long way to go to tweak and find the best settings. I really don't have time to entertain you men who put the EA on 23 pairs using only $1,000. Please read the thread and at least grasp the logic/egy supporting this EA. Just take all we state here with a big pinch of salt - and in the event that you actually understood the logic, potency flaws of this EA, you would instantly know if we are saying things in a light hearted way and when we're serious. I really don't have the energy to entertain you guys who obviously never put in some efforts to read the thread but expect instant gratifiion!!!

  8. #158
    Junior Member Yeyocr's Avatar
    18
    quote Dear SwingMan! My settings its ok?Left corner that the specialist write buyer and vendor no. Why? THX image
    I've over 70 pips (6.45$ with 0.01 lot GJ pair),and not shut the expert.
    What its difficulty?


  9. #159
    It is not my job, but you can use the Optimizer to loe interesting parameter settings. GBPUSD-M15 - Optimization in two measures for March: Profit= 501, PF= 1.65, DD= 1.8% - Outcomes for April: Profit= 479, PF= 1.32, DD= 3.3% GBPJPY-M15 / Optimization April - Profit= 465, PF= 1.16, DD= 3.6% EURCHF-M15 / Optimization April - Profit= 131 PF= 1.69, DD= 0.9% Sure, the profits won't be quite as great within the next month, but after a few optimizations you'll be able to find realistic parameters
    no,you miss know me... If we place max order 1 and pending order 1 then should not ea just take two trade maximum ? It requires many transactions in each direction,that is why I believe it is not functioning correctly.
    Or am I misunderstanding ?
    Thank you.

  10. #160
    Senior Member aaac82's Avatar
    109
    It is not my job, but you can use the Optimizer to loe fascinating parameter settings.

    GBPUSD-M15
    - Optimization in two measures for March: Profit= 501, PF= 1.65, DD= 1.8%
    - Outcomes for April: Profit= 479, PF= 1.32, DD= 3.3%

    GBPJPY-M15 / Optimization April
    - Profit= 465, PF= 1.16, DD= 3.6%

    EURCHF-M15 / Optimization April
    - Profit= 131 PF= 1.69, DD= 0.9%

    Sure, the profits Won't be so great in the next month, but after a few optimizations You'll Be able to find realistic parameters

  •