thread: Help Needed to Debug Existing EA with proven egy

Hey guys, need to a help to know something


As you can see, that the drawdown is actually big, 80 percent, but nor the equity and equilibrium charts fall beneath my deposit. I know I am missing something but don t know what. Any thought?

Edit: when the drawdown is Only the big fall from the graph, it really isn't a problem since it doesn't fall beneath my deposit

quote I think with a slow start and all moving in our favour we can flip dines to dollars with this said, to keep a annual return buoyant one can start with a higher equilibrium and lots, trading one pair as Phillip has stated, all grows with time, more cash, more pairs, everything you think, ? D

not convinced a lot of individuals will have over 10'000 in order to exchange 0.01 lots..Thats the harsh reality as the configurations stand at the moment.
Im not saying we cant find a method,if its there we'll find it

quote yes,but as we reduce the profit target we reduce annual return but we don't necs reduce the draw down. (Thats what I have found ). I truly wish to see this functioning and ive been testing it find any operating long term solutions. It'd be good to see some great results are shown by someone over a calendar year,then we could test a couple more. Keep studying. .

I think using a slow start and all moving in our favour we could flip dines to dollars with this said, to maintain a annual return buoyant one can start with a higher equilibrium and lots, trading one pair as Phillip has stated, all grows with time, more money, more pairs, what you think, ? D
EDIT
Moving to eez off posting until we hear from Phillip, just to make sure we're singing from the same hymn book, lol D

quote Nihilist, I think the profit target breaks the spell, given the way trades are taken the system needs to ascertain the profit target,D

yes,but as we decrease the profit target we decrease yearly return but we do not necs decrease the draw down. (Thats what I've found ).
I really wish to see this working and ive been testing it all day and cant find any working long-term solutions. It would be good to see someone show some great results over a calendar year,then a couple more can be tested by us.
Sick keep testing. .

quote Nihilist, I think the profit Goal breaks the spell, given the way Transactions are taken the Machine needs to determine the profit Goal,D

agree 100 Percent

quote Correct ! But harsh reality check guys... Using Philip Lee's configurations,90% modelling quality. With a fully year back test (2016) using 0.01 lots profit 21% having a drawdown of 27% .... Sounds ok,but that was on a #10000 account ! That test had a 96 transactions that are open ! That makes me quite uncomfortable. Also take into account,not and running hours 0-24 you will get spreads on some of those hours time to get busy testing configurations 3 or 4 months using. Please test 2016 year and then we could then compare configurations and...

Nihilist, I think the profit target breaks the spell, given how transactions are taken the machine needs to determine the profit target,D
EDIT
If transactions go in a straight line it's a no brainer, Thus the volatility Phillip talks about, when this drops the price drops to open multiple positions to pay, D

Hello , I have exactly the same bug like Hanover, Atc Brokers, windows 10. I use exactly the same set stop at 10,000, no filter and range 10. And I have only the HYBRID MODE busy, and buyer and seller set to false, not like Hanover. picture

2017
your preferences
no compound
gbp/cad

looks like we need at least 10k

Just to confirm, the Take Profit is put in currency value, not pips, points, etc.. So the cumulative value is your goal, in case a take profit is at 200 then there'll be a significant journey with many trades open to gain 200 $ unless the lot size looks an proper level, unless you're very fortune and a strong linear motion occurs, at a previous evaluation, Phillip states a $5 evaluation, so TP place at 5, unless something has changed, D

quote Is OK. However, is not it exactly the same with the use of FixLots? I e.g., with my $ 10,000 on the account, compute that 0.01% equals 1 lot, and trade all of the time like that.

Hi all,
first of all I would like to thank all people here for the work and efforts with this idea.
After lurking and reading here for a while I'd love to write down a thought.

Regarding MoneyManagement. Perhaps I am thinking in the wrong way, but so much as I have noticed it's possible
to figure the risk depending on the account balance/equity. TP, on the other side, is, if I understood right, a predetermined
currency worth. Is that right?

Maybe I am wrong, but in my estimation, TP should raise if the traded lotsize is increasing.
For instance, I exchange 0.1 lots and TP is 20, one time my account (hopefully) doubles.
In this case I exchange 0.2 lots, but TP is 20 similar to before. If we change this?

Allow me to know if I did not see anything....
Cheers

quote I will test live just in 2-3 hours, however, the previous version with corrections is 3.3. At present, only she is legitimate ... (OK, you've edited!)

You are TOP MAN, thank you, will post outcomes, D