Hi Billy,
According to my previous posts, the filtering process is the secret to this egy - that is exactly why I need the two EAs to be separated and only serve to perform the trades after we'd created that filtering choice.
I'm sure those of you that are more discerning here would have discerned from my posts that I fully meant to use it only as a tool to assist in my trading - due to its highly flexible approach, I could rely upon it to produce the trade profitable for me if my filtering process and my entry was not spot on.
I had conducted the demo account and also posted the screen shots trading on all 23 pairs 'liberally' simply to show you guys how flexible the approach is and how well it might assist you to turn a not so nicely entered trade to a profitable trade. The purpose is simply to show you guys just how profitable and flexible that approach would be more - in fact I would be very cautious to trade all 23 pairs unless you have the time to study every single pairs in depth first. I hope you guys understand what I am trying to say here.
That is why I insisted from my Thread rules that both separate EAs must be produced perfect first. I know people will instantly suggest that both be combined and a filter be hard coded - in my own experience of having testing completely nearly 100 EAs, I will tell you for true that it will never work as it takes the most important element of an individual filtering process - it's simply impossible to code all of the filters and the constantly changing variables which only an individual person can make.
So Billy, the easy reply to your question is not to exchange whenever there is an upcoming 'reddish' occasion (check it in Cliqforex). However, as could be seen, during those 44 hours testing, there were just two 'red' events since I know that the EA can cope with this, but I could not be bothered. The other choice is to place your SL say - although it would get hit once in a while, as said, when the filtering is performed the SL would be rarely hit.