Thank you for the prompt response and the advise to check Sam's tool.
You're appreciated greatly
 |
 |
Thank you for the prompt response and the advise to check Sam's tool.
You're appreciated greatly
After loe the base system its time for optimize it. Its hopeless one installment works in pairs but its a mistake avoid the bad pairs. Assessing ADR EAX worth we see flat pairs with great movements last week.
This clarifies why avoid bad pairs not work as expected. Any pair could be level one week and destroy egy since you dont have pairs to compensate.
This week's test uses a specific installment in horizontal pairs. The setup uses trailing exits for avoid big opposite candle movement typical of non volatile pairs
Yes B which was what I had been hoping to inform you before
,,, I used to use Adr in Eax and I noticed that eventually excellent trades were taken in pairs excluded by the Adr . .
But what you state here it is interesting gt;lt;gt;lt;gt;lt; It?s impossible one installment works well in all pairs
Loing the Correct setup then will take some time to calibrate it to the Ideal sets of pairs
Thank you brain, you thought about every detail!
Last week was quite interesting. We had days combined with a few movements pre nfp. Perfect week for rest grails dre. The conclusions are clear:
1} DD is the most significant area. Small DD converts drain blood days in a irrelevant hurt. Systems collapses when the worst instances happens. You have possibilities in extended term if you may minimize consequences.
Two) Other key area is timing. Trade has to be put in the best loion. This means that you need to accept you cant ch all good movements. Anticipate movement force to eliminate delay. And way to eliminate delay lagged tools would be delay signals after first motion. As how do not exists perfect motions then you've discard movements havent clear arrangement
3) Have transactions by measure is significant also. This behaviour makes exchange DD could be consumed for profitable trades.
4) Dymamic markets simply can be traded with success with energetic systems. Then all principles have to look random
1} Catch shows some interesting things. Worst loss is same than profit ( 9$). This means system may recover a loss. This enables commerce recovery not invest much profitable trades letting them grow profit, maybe not insure the loss
2) Win ratio is large. This lows you endure a lengthy loss row with possibilities to blow account
3) DD is 4 times lower than profit. Pips declines are 50 percent of profit. This numbers unite growing balance that is consistency
Captures shows equity and balance. Some interesting points are:
1} Weekly closed profit without week losses was 528 pips. The declines were less 50 percent of raw profit. Then bad transactions didnt empty profits much
2) Equity week profit was reasonable thinking week was nfp week.
3) Profit average per commerce was 21 pips ( 328 / 15 transactions)
4) Last week'd larger profit that previous even market was almost flat (328 vs 252)
About system results have some studying:
1) Closes were only by monitoring. This was a limit in system. Anyways was able to close some long trades (more 50 pips)
two) Opposite exits not worked because were so slow. This affect trade length. Some trades were long time in crimson with a few days duration. With exists operating length ought to be shorter and down risk of possess the worst closure ( SL). This must improve profits apparently
3) With system almost all entrances are recoverable in first two days. After that risk to possess SL grows quickly
Next week I shall test alterations for try resolve some problems commented. For a system that is ancient its evident can work without problems in most market scenarios. This is a big improvement comparing with rules systems that are fixed
That NzdUsd isn't convincing ,, a bit suspicious ...
I see a big gap then maybe we will have luck...
this maybe tells you something ....
Reply With Quote
