thread: M TTT M

Hi , congrats to your latest threat ... I actually salute all of the authors as it consumes lots of time to operate, manage and supervise a thread. I need to digest and register even I am one of Quantum's artists. Wish you the very best.

Welcome Togerhard,

Yes its quite time consuming to maintain a thread going.

Yes I trade Quantum in the background but it needs deep pockets and comparatively compact place sizes then its an instance of syphoning off a number of the DD before it has a opportunity to get too big.

Im to have a 1K account live and drive it to 10K... this still eludes me however, I am analyzing hybrid type egies so 1 day perhaps a success story.

Great to see you about and I want you all the very best in your continuing quest to master that Quantum monster.

...

interesting concept... let see how the thread belongs

Welcome Roszey....

Its sure to be interesting provided traders participate.

Lets watch.

...

quote instead of openning 3 trades just open Short GU 2x size I didnt get d e logic, sorry

Nope ... not such a good idea in my opinion.

You are putting all of your delegated risk into just the 1 brief GU trade with dual position size.

As an exercise you can back test the three trade egy versus the only GU trade.

Over a big enough sample size I know which setup I would be trading.

Its all about spreading the risk ... not focusing it.

...

Hello ,

congrats to a most recent threat ... I really salute all of the authors here as it absorbs plenty of time to operate, manage and oversee a ribbon. I have to digest murrey and register I am among Quantum's warriors. Wish you all the best.

Interesting notion... let see how the thread belongs

quote All these are simply examples. There are dozens and dozens of ways. Part of the process involves deciding on your pair configurations. The trader has the discretion to market the pairs or not. Take note that in the end of the day what matters say in the event of an Order 3 TS is to win at least 2 trades. Doing this will make the trader net positive ... simple math. Its as straightforward as that. However, is it simple ? ....

Rather than openning 3 trades just open Brief GU 2x dimensions

I didnt get d logic, sorry

Elsewhere, some cases will be outlined.

I would suggest that traders considering the method to please read through Article 1.

Unfortunately its well past my sleeping time so I am off to rest.

See you all later on.

ps. Calculations will be posted showing the ratios for various order TS's.

....

Trade #1 = brief EU gt;gt; Short E n Long U Trade #2 = brief GU gt;gt; Short G n Long U Trade #3 = extended EG gt;gt; Long E n Brief G u have Hedged E Long Ux2 Short Gx2 ?? quote

All these are simply examples.

There are hundreds of different techniques to exchange it.

Component of this procedure involves deciding on your pair configurations.

The trader has the discretion to hedge the pairs or not.

Take notice that in the end of the day what really matters state in the case of an Order 3 TS is to acquire at least 2 trades from the 9.

Doing so will make the trader net positive ... simple math.

Its as Straightforward as that.

But is it simple ?

....

M TTT M Trading System

Article 1 covers the basics of the process so for those interested please begin by reading the material.

Asking questions is a fantastic means to learn so don't hesitate to ask.

Once the basics are understood its meant to be a simple approach.

Employing a positive reward to risk ratio that allows only requires a couple of winners out of many transactions to be profitable.

Use the template in an M15 or M5 chart.

Later I will connect a demo account to a Trade Explorer and proceed through the steps required to decide on the pairs and the way they get exchanged.

Try it out on demonion.

All the best,

....

EURUSD

Loss trade

-0.9%

....